WATCH: ABC’s George Stephanopoulos Abruptly Ended Interview with JD Vance, Cut His Mic as Vance Explained Potential Refusal to Obey SCOTUS

In an incident from the winter of 2024 showing the sort of pre-existing hostility between members of the second Trump Administration and the media that helps explain blow-ups between the media apparatchiks and Trump Administration members in the early months of his presidency, ABC News essentially threw then- potential VP candidate Vance off of an interview, cutting him off and ending his feed, as he tried answering a question about the Supreme Court and potential defiance of it, something that became a matter of importance for the Trump Administration within months of the president’s inauguration.

As background, the incident involved ABC News’s George Stephanopoulos and JD Vance, with Vance getting shut off as he tried to answer the host’s question in a startling incident. The immense hostility shown in the incident has remained intact since Trump’s electoral victory, as shown by incidents such as Trump White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt obliterating the media over its lies about Pete Hegseth and media stations like ABC showing overt bias against Trump in their coverage of his pardons. Further, ABC has since had to settle with Trump over false claims made against him.

Additionally, the incident was an early indication that the Trump Administration would consider disobeying the Supreme Court of the United States if it disagreed with the court’s ruling, something that has become a major matter as judges use their position to constrain President Trump as he tries to cut waste in the federal budget and deport illegal immigrants. The Trump Administration has labeled them “Democrat activists” and indicated it might disobey their rulings, something that could eventually lead to a disobeyal of the

In the incident, which captured both the hostility between Team Trump and the media and friction between Team Trump and the judiciary, occurred on Sunday, February 4, 2024. It began when Vance noted that there are situations in which the president would be right to disobey SCOTUS, such as when it tried blocking him from exercising his constitutional prerogative as the Commander-in-Chief, the same general situation that has come up with Judge Boasberg.

Speaking on the matter, JD Vance pointed to what could happen if SCOTUS tried blocking Trump from firing a general, saying, “The Constitution says that the Supreme Court can make rulings, but if the Supreme Court ― and look, I hope that they would not do this ― but if the Supreme Court said the president of the United States can’t fire a general, that would be an illegitimate ruling and the president has to have Article 2 prerogative under the Constitution to actually run the military as he sees fit.”

Further, the Vice President noted that doing so wouldn’t necessarily be an aberration in American history, and that the president would be in the right if he did so. He said, “This is just basic constitutional legitimacy. You’re talking about a hypothetical where the Supreme Court tries to run the military. I don’t think that’s going to happen, George. But of course, if it did, the president would have to respond to it. There are multiple examples throughout American history of the president doing just that.”

The two then started bickering when Stephanopoulos asked Vance if Trump would have to abide by a legitimate SCOTUS ruling, and eventually, the ABC News host furiously snapped, “You’ve made it very clear you believe the president can defy the Supreme Court.” Vance tried responding, saying, “No, no, George …” but Stephanopoulos wouldn’t let him respond, and instead cut off his mic and cut his feed, going to commercial break.

*” indicates required fields

Watch the incident here:

 

Vance also said, when fighting with the ABC host’s questioning of his claim that Trump could fire federal bureaucrats, something that has also since become an issue, “And, of course, the president has to be able to run the government as he thinks he should. That’s the way the Constitution works. It has been thwarted too much by the way our bureaucracy has worked over the past 15 years.”

Featured image credit: screengrab from the embedded video

Related Posts

A Father Goes Viral After Saying He’s Proud of His Daughter for Joining

A short video shared online has ignited a massive debate after a father publicly stated that he supports—and is proud of—his adult daughter for joining OnlyFans. Within…

Seven of Nine: Tension and secrets on set of Star Trek

Watching her walk around Voyager in her body suits was kind of mesmerizing – but her character was really interesting, too. But did you know she had…

Your worst day will be tomorrow, if you IGNORE the curse.

Don’t Ignore Your Health and Wellbeing—Small Actions Today Make Tomorrow Better 🌟 Sometimes headlines about “curses” are just ways of grabbing attention. The real takeaway is that…

This photograph, taken in 1943, shook the entire world and reason… See more

THE 1943 PHOTO THAT DEFIES TIMEBy The Truth Seeker UNITED KINGDOM – A 1943 photograph from World War II has stunned historians, scientists, and conspiracy theorists. Amid…

Pregnant woman in surgery because of…

Pregnant Woman Undergoes Surgery – Doctors Acting to Ensure Safety 🏥🤰 A pregnant woman recently required a surgical procedure to address a medical complication during her pregnancy….

If you see one of these in your house, don’t touch it, just run for

If You See One of These in Your House, Don’t Touch It—Leave Immediately! ⚠️🏠 Experts warn that certain creatures or hazards in your home can be dangerous…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *