A man who falsely presented himself as a taxi driver has been convicted after a Scottish court found he deliberately misled and detained a young woman during what should have been a routine journey home, before subjecting her to serious and distressing misconduct inside his vehicle.

The case, heard at Falkirk Sheriff Court, highlighted the dangers of unlicensed transport and the vulnerability of individuals traveling alone at night. Jurors concluded that Mahmoud Kalawizada, 32, exploited trust and circumstance to place a 22-year-old woman in a situation of fear and harm, following a late-night encounter in Stirling.

A Late-Night Decision That Turned Into a Nightmare

In the early hours of the morning, shortly after 1 a.m., the woman was attempting to return home after an evening out in Stirling town centre. Like many others in the area, she sought transport near an official taxi rank located close to a popular nightlife venue.

Kalawizada’s dark blue BMW was parked in a loading bay beside the rank, creating the impression that it was operating as a legitimate taxi. According to evidence heard by the court, the woman approached the vehicle believing it was part of the official queue and asked whether it was available.

Although Kalawizada held no taxi licence and was not legally permitted to offer transport services, he indicated that he could take her home. Reassured by the vehicle’s location and his response, the woman provided her address and entered the car.

She sat in the front passenger seat, later explaining that the rear doors appeared to be locked, further reinforcing her assumption that the car was operating as a taxi.

A Journey That Took an Alarming Turn

Rather than driving directly to the destination provided, Kalawizada diverted from the expected route. The journey, which should have been straightforward, instead extended across areas of Clackmannanshire, with multiple unexpected stops along the way.

The woman later told the court that she began to feel increasingly uneasy as the car moved further away from her home. One stop was made at a fast-food outlet, and another involved the driver pulling over to speak to her in a manner that caused significant discomfort and concern.

Eventually, the car entered a quiet residential street in Tillicoultry, an area unfamiliar to the passenger. At that point, her fear escalated.

“I was terrified,” she told the jury. “I knew this wasn’t where I lived, and I didn’t understand why we were there.”

When the car stopped, she heard a clicking sound that she believed indicated the doors had been locked. She attempted to leave the vehicle but was initially unable to open the door.

Fear, Resistance, and Escape

Evidence presented in court described how Kalawizada attempted to move closer to the woman inside the confined space of the vehicle, touching her without consent. The situation caused her extreme distress.

In a moment of desperation, she screamed loudly in an attempt to attract attention from nearby residents. That reaction, she said, appeared to startle him.

“I screamed as loudly as I could,” she told the court. “I was trying to get someone to hear me.”

Her actions proved critical. She managed to open the door and escape the vehicle, after which Kalawizada drove away from the scene.

Shaken and in tears, the woman immediately contacted her boyfriend, who came to collect her. She later described struggling to process what had happened, stating that the experience left her deeply distressed.

Police Investigation and Corroborating Evidence

Police were notified shortly afterward and launched an investigation. Officers reviewed CCTV footage from the surrounding area, including Ellistoun Drive, where the incident occurred.

While cameras did not capture visual evidence of the incident itself, an audio recording from nearby equipment recorded a high-pitched scream followed by sounds of distress at approximately 1:56 a.m. Prosecutors told the court that this audio strongly supported the woman’s account.

The recording was played during the trial and was described as deeply unsettling.

Stirling Council also confirmed during proceedings that Kalawizada was not, and had never been, a licensed taxi driver.

The Accused’s Account

Kalawizada, who was living in Stirling at the time but now resides in North London, denied all allegations. Giving evidence through an interpreter, he claimed that he had been in Stirling after dining with friends when the woman approached him asking for a lift.

He told the court that he agreed to help because he “felt sorry for her” and insisted that no inappropriate behavior took place. He denied detaining her, denied making advances, and denied misrepresenting himself as a taxi driver.

Despite his testimony, the jury rejected his version of events.

Guilty Verdict and Immediate Custody

After a three-day trial, jurors took less than 90 minutes to reach a unanimous guilty verdict on all charges. These included misleading the woman by implying he was a taxi driver, unlawfully detaining her by diverting from her stated destination, and using a vehicle for hire without the appropriate licence or insurance.

Following the verdict, Sheriff Craig Harris ordered that Kalawizada be remanded in custody pending sentencing reports.

Explaining the decision to revoke bail, the sheriff described the conduct as “predatory behaviour against a young woman” and emphasized the serious risk posed to public safety.

“This conviction involved deliberate deception,” the sheriff said. “It demonstrates a danger to members of the public, particularly women who rely on transport late at night.”

Sheriff Harris added that higher courts had consistently made clear that crimes involving deception and exploitation of individuals seeking safe transport would be treated with the utmost seriousness.

“There is a substantial risk of further offences if bail were granted,” he concluded.

Background and Mitigation

Defence counsel John Brannigan told the court that Kalawizada had no previous criminal convictions and worked part-time as an upholsterer. Although now living in London, he maintained family ties in Stirling.

Records from Companies House also showed that he is listed as the sole director of a recently incorporated motor maintenance business based in London.

Despite these points, the court determined that the severity of the offence and the clear breach of trust outweighed mitigation arguments at this stage.

A Case With Wider Implications

The case has prompted renewed discussion around the importance of licensed transport, particularly in nightlife areas. Authorities have reiterated advice urging the public to use registered taxis and verified ride services, especially during late hours.

For the victim, the trial marked a difficult but necessary step toward accountability. Her testimony, supported by audio evidence and investigative findings, proved central to securing the conviction.

Kalawizada appeared solemn as he was led from the courtroom to the holding cells, bringing the trial phase of the case to a close. Sentencing is expected to take place following the completion of court-ordered reports.